Eswatini vs Guinea: Net ODA received from DAC donors

Eswatini
66.92 million constant 2010 US$
in 2011
Guinea
82.49 million constant 2010 US$
in 2011
Eswatini rank
45th
Guinea rank
44th

Net ODA received from DAC donors over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guinea
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196019852011

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 82.49 million constant 2010 US$ against 66.92 million constant 2010 US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 15.57 million constant 2010 US$.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 45th and Guinea ranks 44th of 53 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 78.39 million constant 2010 US$ 71.41 million constant 2010 US$ 6.97 million constant 2010 US$ Eswatini
1970s 51.78 million constant 2010 US$ 27.57 million constant 2010 US$ 24.21 million constant 2010 US$ Eswatini
1980s 49.32 million constant 2010 US$ 170.67 million constant 2010 US$ 121.35 million constant 2010 US$ Guinea
1990s 37.93 million constant 2010 US$ 244.78 million constant 2010 US$ 206.85 million constant 2010 US$ Guinea
2000s 14.81 million constant 2010 US$ 173.72 million constant 2010 US$ 158.91 million constant 2010 US$ Guinea
2010s 49.63 million constant 2010 US$ 89.75 million constant 2010 US$ 40.12 million constant 2010 US$ Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Eswatini or Guinea?
Guinea, at 82.49 million constant 2010 US$ against 66.92 million constant 2010 US$ in Eswatini as of 2011.
What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Eswatini and Guinea?
15.57 million constant 2010 US$, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea?
52 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2011.
How do Eswatini and Guinea rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
Eswatini ranks 45th and Guinea ranks 44th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Aid Recipients, Development Cooperation Report, and Inte, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (constant 2010 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guinea: Net ODA received from DAC donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Aid Recipients, Development Cooperation Report, and Inte. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-dac-donors-constant-2010-us/eswatini/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-dac-donors-constant-2010-us/eswatini/guinea/">Eswatini vs Guinea: Net ODA received from DAC donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net ODA received from DAC donors (constant 2010 US$)
Unit
constant 2010 US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Aid Recipients, Development Cooperation Report, and Inte
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 2,887 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed

Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period. Data are in constant 2008 dollars.