Africa vs Rwanda: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Africa
8.2%
in 2011
Rwanda
43.4%
in 2011
Africa rank
5th
Rwanda rank
8th
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Africa
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 43.4% against 8.2% in Africa, a difference of 35.2%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 5.3 times Africa's.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Africa ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 6 groups.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 21.2% | 80.1% | 58.9% | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 8.9% | 80.4% | 71.5% | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 12.8% | 42.4% | 29.6% | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 15.1% | 144.3% | 129.2% | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 9.3% | 65.8% | 56.6% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 7.6% | 44.9% | 37.3% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Africa or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 43.4% against 8.2% in Africa as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Africa and Rwanda?
- 35.2%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Rwanda?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Africa and Rwanda rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Africa ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 8th of 6 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.