Chad vs Sierra Leone: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Chad
10.2%
in 2010
Sierra Leone
14.4%
in 2011
Chad rank
31st
Sierra Leone rank
28th
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Chad
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 14.4% against 10.2% in Chad, a difference of 4.2%.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.4 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 31st and Sierra Leone ranks 28th of 49 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 137.8% | 55.4% | 82.5% | Chad |
| 1990s | 72.1% | 369.4% | 297.3% | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 13.6% | 270.1% | 256.5% | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 10.2% | 32.2% | 22.0% | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Chad or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 14.4% against 10.2% in Chad as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Chad and Sierra Leone?
- 4.2%, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Sierra Leone?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2010.
- How do Chad and Sierra Leone rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Chad ranks 31st and Sierra Leone ranks 28th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.