Congo vs Mauritius: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Congo
4.8%
in 2011
Mauritius
4.0%
in 2011
Congo rank
38th
Mauritius rank
40th
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Congo
- Mauritius
How they compare
Congo currently reports 4.8% against 4.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 38th and Mauritius ranks 40th of 49 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 17.6% | 5.6% | 12.1% | Congo |
| 1980s | 13.3% | 11.5% | 1.7% | Congo |
| 1990s | 27.1% | 2.8% | 24.3% | Congo |
| 2000s | 17.2% | 1.0% | 16.2% | Congo |
| 2010s | 27.1% | 3.2% | 23.8% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Congo or Mauritius?
- Congo, at 4.8% against 4.0% in Mauritius as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Congo and Mauritius?
- 0.8%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritius?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2011.
- How do Congo and Mauritius rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Congo ranks 38th and Mauritius ranks 40th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.