Cote d'Ivoire vs Tanzania: Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDI)
Cote d'Ivoire
18.3%
in 2011
Tanzania
19.0%
in 2011
Cote d'Ivoire rank
24th
Tanzania rank
23rd
Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDI) over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 19.0% against 18.3% in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 24th and Tanzania ranks 23rd of 49 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.3% | 55.1% | 7.8% | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 24.1% | 35.6% | 11.6% | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 16.1% | 20.8% | 4.7% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Cote d'Ivoire or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 19.0% against 18.3% in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Cote d'Ivoire and Tanzania?
- 0.7%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Tanzania?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Tanzania rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 24th and Tanzania ranks 23rd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.