Eswatini vs Lesotho: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Eswatini
17.6%
in 2011
Lesotho
16.8%
in 2011
Eswatini rank
25th
Lesotho rank
26th
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Eswatini
- Lesotho
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 17.6% against 16.8% in Lesotho, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Lesotho ahead.
Eswatini ranks 25th and Lesotho ranks 26th of 49 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 70.8% | 189.8% | 119.0% | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 19.9% | 43.8% | 23.9% | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 16.5% | 44.3% | 27.8% | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 11.3% | 12.5% | 1.2% | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 3.3% | 12.5% | 9.2% | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 12.9% | 16.1% | 3.2% | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Eswatini or Lesotho?
- Eswatini, at 17.6% against 16.8% in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Eswatini and Lesotho?
- 0.8%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lesotho?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Lesotho rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Eswatini ranks 25th and Lesotho ranks 26th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.