Eswatini vs Tanzania: Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDI)
Eswatini
17.6%
in 2011
Tanzania
19.0%
in 2011
Eswatini rank
25th
Tanzania rank
23rd
Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDI) over time
- Eswatini
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 19.0% against 17.6% in Eswatini, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 25th and Tanzania ranks 23rd of 49 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.3% | 55.1% | 43.8% | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 3.3% | 35.6% | 32.3% | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 12.9% | 20.8% | 7.8% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Eswatini or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 19.0% against 17.6% in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Eswatini and Tanzania?
- 1.4%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tanzania?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Tanzania rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Eswatini ranks 25th and Tanzania ranks 23rd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.