Mauritius vs Sudan: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Mauritius
4.0%
in 2011
Sudan
4.8%
in 2011
Mauritius rank
40th
Sudan rank
37th
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Mauritius
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 4.8% against 4.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 40th and Sudan ranks 37th of 49 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 5.6% | 8.0% | 2.4% | Sudan |
| 1980s | 11.5% | 35.1% | 23.6% | Sudan |
| 1990s | 2.8% | 11.9% | 9.1% | Sudan |
| 2000s | 1.0% | 10.9% | 9.9% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 3.2% | 7.5% | 4.3% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Mauritius or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 4.8% against 4.0% in Mauritius as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Mauritius and Sudan?
- 0.8%, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sudan?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2011.
- How do Mauritius and Sudan rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Mauritius ranks 40th and Sudan ranks 37th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.