Burundi vs Cape Verde: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Burundi
11.7%
in 2011
Cape Verde
11.6%
in 2011
Burundi rank
6th
Cape Verde rank
7th
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Burundi
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 11.7% against 11.6% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Burundi ranks 6th and Cape Verde ranks 7th of 53 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Cape Verde in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Cape Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 7.2% | 28.9% | 21.7% | Cape Verde |
| 1990s | 9.7% | 18.5% | 8.8% | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 13.9% | 9.8% | 4.1% | Burundi |
| 2010s | 12.8% | 13.3% | 0.4% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Burundi or Cape Verde?
- Burundi, at 11.7% against 11.6% in Cape Verde as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Burundi and Cape Verde?
- 0.1%, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Cape Verde?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2011.
- How do Burundi and Cape Verde rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Burundi ranks 6th and Cape Verde ranks 7th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.