Cape Verde vs Djibouti: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Cape Verde
11.6%
in 2011
Djibouti
9.3%
in 2009
Cape Verde rank
7th
Djibouti rank
8th
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Cape Verde
- Djibouti
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 11.6% against 9.3% in Djibouti, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.2 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 7th and Djibouti ranks 8th of 53 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 25.6% | 15.8% | 9.8% | Cape Verde |
| 1990s | 18.5% | 16.1% | 2.4% | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 9.8% | 7.5% | 2.3% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Cape Verde or Djibouti?
- Cape Verde, at 11.6% against 9.3% in Djibouti as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Cape Verde and Djibouti?
- 2.3%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Djibouti?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2009.
- How do Cape Verde and Djibouti rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Cape Verde ranks 7th and Djibouti ranks 8th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.