Cape Verde vs Rwanda: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Cape Verde
11.6%
in 2011
Rwanda
9.3%
in 2011
Cape Verde rank
7th
Rwanda rank
9th
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Cape Verde
- Rwanda
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 11.6% against 9.3% in Rwanda, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 53 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 28.9% | 6.4% | 22.4% | Cape Verde |
| 1990s | 18.5% | 17.8% | 0.7% | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 9.8% | 10.4% | 0.5% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 13.3% | 9.5% | 3.8% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Cape Verde or Rwanda?
- Cape Verde, at 11.6% against 9.3% in Rwanda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Cape Verde and Rwanda?
- 2.3%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Rwanda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Rwanda rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Cape Verde ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.