Djibouti vs Mozambique: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Djibouti
9.3%
in 2009
Mozambique
13.3%
in 2011
Djibouti rank
8th
Mozambique rank
5th
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Djibouti
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 13.3% against 9.3% in Djibouti, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.4 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 8th and Mozambique ranks 5th of 53 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 15.8% | 21.9% | 6.1% | Mozambique |
| 1990s | 16.1% | 27.7% | 11.6% | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 7.5% | 16.5% | 9.0% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Djibouti or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 13.3% against 9.3% in Djibouti as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Djibouti and Mozambique?
- 4.0%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Mozambique?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2009.
- How do Djibouti and Mozambique rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Djibouti ranks 8th and Mozambique ranks 5th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.