Eswatini vs Ghana: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Eswatini
1.6%
in 2011
Ghana
2.3%
in 2011
Eswatini rank
35th
Ghana rank
32nd
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Eswatini
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 2.3% against 1.6% in Eswatini, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.4 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 35th and Ghana ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Ghana in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15.6% | 1.7% | 13.9% | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 4.8% | 1.9% | 2.9% | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 4.2% | 2.8% | 1.4% | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 1.9% | 5.3% | 3.4% | Ghana |
| 2000s | 0.5% | 5.5% | 5.1% | Ghana |
| 2010s | 1.2% | 2.5% | 1.3% | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Eswatini or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 2.3% against 1.6% in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Eswatini and Ghana?
- 0.7%, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Ghana?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Ghana rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Eswatini ranks 35th and Ghana ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.