Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Lesotho
5.9%
in 2011
Zimbabwe
5.6%
in 2011
Lesotho rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
19th
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Lesotho
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 5.9% against 5.6% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 53 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16.1% | 0.2% | 15.9% | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 11.2% | 0.1% | 11.1% | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 17.6% | 2.8% | 14.8% | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 7.9% | 4.2% | 3.8% | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 3.5% | 5.0% | 1.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 5.1% | 6.3% | 1.2% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Lesotho or Zimbabwe?
- Lesotho, at 5.9% against 5.6% in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3%, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Lesotho and Zimbabwe rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Lesotho ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.