Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Liberia or Sao Tome and Principe?

Liberia, at 33.8% against 15.3% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2011.

How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Sao Tome and Principe?

12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.

Where does this data come from?

Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Liberia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received from DAC donors

Liberia

33.8%

in 2011

Sao Tome and Principe

15.3%

in 2011

Liberia rank

1st

Sao Tome and Principe rank

4th

Net ODA received from DAC donors over time

Liberia
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 33.8% against 15.3% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 18.5%.

That makes Liberia's figure about 2.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Liberia ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 4th of 53 countries.

Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Liberia	Sao Tome and Principe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	27.9%	19.6%	8.3%	Liberia
2010s	44.1%	15.9%	28.2%	Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Liberia or Sao Tome and Principe?: Liberia, at 33.8% against 15.3% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2011.
What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Liberia and Sao Tome and Principe?: 18.5%, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Sao Tome and Principe?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
How do Liberia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?: Liberia ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 4th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received from DAC donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-dac-donors-percent-of-recipient-s-gdp/liberia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-dac-donors-percent-of-recipient-s-gdp/liberia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Liberia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received from DAC donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP)
Unit: % of recipient's GDP
Source: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 59 places, 2,602 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.