Malawi vs Tanzania: Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP)
Malawi
8.0%
in 2011
Tanzania
7.0%
in 2011
Malawi rank
11th
Tanzania rank
13th
Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP) over time
- Malawi
- Tanzania
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 8.0% against 7.0% in Tanzania, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Tanzania ahead.
Malawi ranks 11th and Tanzania ranks 13th of 53 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 12.3% | 15.5% | 3.3% | Tanzania |
| 1990s | 12.0% | 12.3% | 0.3% | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 11.5% | 7.9% | 3.6% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 8.8% | 7.1% | 1.7% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Malawi or Tanzania?
- Malawi, at 8.0% against 7.0% in Tanzania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Malawi and Tanzania?
- 1.0%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tanzania?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2011.
- How do Malawi and Tanzania rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Malawi ranks 11th and Tanzania ranks 13th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.