Mali vs Rwanda: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Mali
7.2%
in 2011
Rwanda
9.3%
in 2011
Mali rank
12th
Rwanda rank
9th
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Mali
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 9.3% against 7.2% in Mali, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.3 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Rwanda ahead.
Mali ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 53 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.7% | 7.1% | 3.4% | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 6.0% | 8.8% | 2.8% | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 11.9% | 6.4% | 5.5% | Mali |
| 1990s | 10.7% | 17.8% | 7.2% | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 7.5% | 10.4% | 2.9% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 7.2% | 9.5% | 2.3% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Mali or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 9.3% against 7.2% in Mali as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Mali and Rwanda?
- 2.1%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Rwanda?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2011.
- How do Mali and Rwanda rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Mali ranks 12th and Rwanda ranks 9th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.