Niger vs Zimbabwe: Net ODA received from DAC donors
Niger
5.0%
in 2011
Zimbabwe
5.6%
in 2011
Niger rank
21st
Zimbabwe rank
19th
Net ODA received from DAC donors over time
- Niger
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 5.6% against 5.0% in Niger, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Niger ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 53 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.4% | 0.3% | 2.1% | Niger |
| 1970s | 5.3% | 0.1% | 5.2% | Niger |
| 1980s | 8.2% | 2.8% | 5.4% | Niger |
| 1990s | 10.7% | 4.2% | 6.5% | Niger |
| 2000s | 6.5% | 5.0% | 1.6% | Niger |
| 2010s | 6.0% | 6.3% | 0.3% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from dac donors, Niger or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 5.6% against 5.0% in Niger as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from dac donors between Niger and Zimbabwe?
- 0.6%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Zimbabwe?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2011.
- How do Niger and Zimbabwe rank globally for net oda received from dac donors?
- Niger ranks 21st and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from DAC donors (% of recipient's GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.