Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritius: Net ODA received from multilateral donors

Guinea-Bissau
66.29 million constant 2010 US$
in 2011
Mauritius
70.83 million constant 2010 US$
in 2011
Guinea-Bissau rank
42nd
Mauritius rank
41st

Net ODA received from multilateral donors over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Mauritius
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M196019852011

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 70.83 million constant 2010 US$ against 66.29 million constant 2010 US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 4.54 million constant 2010 US$.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Mauritius ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 42nd and Mauritius ranks 41st of 53 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 32.06 million constant 2010 US$ 44.45 million constant 2010 US$ 12.40 million constant 2010 US$ Mauritius
1980s 74.28 million constant 2010 US$ 22.24 million constant 2010 US$ 52.04 million constant 2010 US$ Guinea-Bissau
1990s 65.52 million constant 2010 US$ 24.23 million constant 2010 US$ 41.29 million constant 2010 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 67.82 million constant 2010 US$ 33.20 million constant 2010 US$ 34.62 million constant 2010 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 78.23 million constant 2010 US$ 72.14 million constant 2010 US$ 6.09 million constant 2010 US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net oda received from multilateral donors, Guinea-Bissau or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 70.83 million constant 2010 US$ against 66.29 million constant 2010 US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2011.
What is the difference in net oda received from multilateral donors between Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius?
4.54 million constant 2010 US$, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius?
38 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2011.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Mauritius rank globally for net oda received from multilateral donors?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 42nd and Mauritius ranks 41st of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from multilateral donors (constant 2010 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritius: Net ODA received from multilateral donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-multilateral-donors-constant-2010-us/guinea-bissau/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-multilateral-donors-constant-2010-us/guinea-bissau/mauritius/">Guinea-Bissau vs Mauritius: Net ODA received from multilateral donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net ODA received from multilateral donors (constant 2010 US$)
Unit
constant 2010 US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 2,860 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed

Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period. Data are in constant 2008 dollars.