Libya vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received from multilateral donors

Libya
58.69 million current US$
in 2011
Sao Tome and Principe
37.16 million current US$
in 2011
Libya rank
44th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
47th

Net ODA received from multilateral donors over time

  • Libya
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020.0M40.0M60.0M196019852011

How they compare

Libya currently reports 58.69 million current US$ against 37.16 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 21.53 million current US$.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.6 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 44th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 47th of 53 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 635,000 current US$ 160,000 current US$ 475,000 current US$ Libya
1970s 1.05 million current US$ 3.37 million current US$ 2.32 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 2.80 million current US$ 9.37 million current US$ 6.57 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 1.92 million current US$ 19.36 million current US$ 17.44 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 7.33 million current US$ 14.08 million current US$ 6.75 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 24.41 million current US$ 26.71 million current US$ 2.31 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net oda received from multilateral donors, Libya or Sao Tome and Principe?
Libya, at 58.69 million current US$ against 37.16 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2011.
What is the difference in net oda received from multilateral donors between Libya and Sao Tome and Principe?
21.53 million current US$, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sao Tome and Principe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2011.
How do Libya and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net oda received from multilateral donors?
Libya ranks 44th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 47th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from multilateral donors (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received from multilateral donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-multilateral-donors-current-us/libya/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-multilateral-donors-current-us/libya/sao-tome-and-principe/">Libya vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received from multilateral donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net ODA received from multilateral donors (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 2,860 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed

Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period. Data are in current U.S. dollars.