Angola vs South Africa: Net ODA received from multilateral donors
Angola
0.1%
in 2011
South Africa
0.1%
in 2011
Angola rank
47th
South Africa rank
49th
Net ODA received from multilateral donors over time
- Angola
- South Africa
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.3 times South Africa's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 47th and South Africa ranks 49th of 53 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.4% | 0.1% | 5.3% | Angola |
| 2000s | 1.0% | 0.1% | 0.9% | Angola |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from multilateral donors, Angola or South Africa?
- Angola, at 0.1% against 0.1% in South Africa as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from multilateral donors between Angola and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and South Africa?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Angola and South Africa rank globally for net oda received from multilateral donors?
- Angola ranks 47th and South Africa ranks 49th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from multilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.