Angola vs Tunisia: Net ODA received from multilateral donors
Angola
0.1%
in 2011
Tunisia
0.3%
in 2011
Angola rank
47th
Tunisia rank
45th
Net ODA received from multilateral donors over time
- Angola
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.3% against 0.1% in Angola, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 4.2 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 47th and Tunisia ranks 45th of 53 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% | Angola |
| 1990s | 4.2% | 0.6% | 3.7% | Angola |
| 2000s | 1.0% | 0.4% | 0.6% | Angola |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.3% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from multilateral donors, Angola or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0.3% against 0.1% in Angola as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from multilateral donors between Angola and Tunisia?
- 0.2%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Tunisia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2011.
- How do Angola and Tunisia rank globally for net oda received from multilateral donors?
- Angola ranks 47th and Tunisia ranks 45th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from multilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.