Cape Verde vs Zimbabwe: Net ODA received from multilateral donors
Cape Verde
1.3%
in 2011
Zimbabwe
1.8%
in 2011
Cape Verde rank
36th
Zimbabwe rank
33rd
Net ODA received from multilateral donors over time
- Cape Verde
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1.8% against 1.3% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 10.5% | 0.5% | 10.0% | Cape Verde |
| 1990s | 8.3% | 1.7% | 6.6% | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 4.9% | 1.1% | 3.8% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 3.1% | 2.3% | 0.8% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from multilateral donors, Cape Verde or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1.8% against 1.3% in Cape Verde as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from multilateral donors between Cape Verde and Zimbabwe?
- 0.5%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Zimbabwe rank globally for net oda received from multilateral donors?
- Cape Verde ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from multilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.