Chad vs Zambia: Net ODA received from multilateral donors
Chad
2.1%
in 2011
Zambia
1.9%
in 2011
Chad rank
31st
Zambia rank
32nd
Net ODA received from multilateral donors over time
- Chad
- Zambia
How they compare
Chad currently reports 2.1% against 1.9% in Zambia, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 31st and Zambia ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.4% | 0.0% | 1.4% | Chad |
| 1970s | 2.7% | 0.5% | 2.3% | Chad |
| 1980s | 5.4% | 2.4% | 3.0% | Chad |
| 1990s | 7.2% | 11.2% | 4.0% | Zambia |
| 2000s | 4.2% | 5.9% | 1.6% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 2.2% | 1.9% | 0.3% | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from multilateral donors, Chad or Zambia?
- Chad, at 2.1% against 1.9% in Zambia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from multilateral donors between Chad and Zambia?
- 0.2%, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Zambia?
- 48 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2011.
- How do Chad and Zambia rank globally for net oda received from multilateral donors?
- Chad ranks 31st and Zambia ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from multilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.