Cape Verde vs Congo: Net ODA received from multilateral donors
Cape Verde
3.6%
in 2011
Congo
2.1%
in 2011
Cape Verde rank
35th
Congo rank
38th
Net ODA received from multilateral donors over time
- Cape Verde
- Congo
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 3.6% against 2.1% in Congo, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.7 times Congo's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 35th and Congo ranks 38th of 49 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 24.0% | 2.5% | 21.5% | Cape Verde |
| 1990s | 22.2% | 3.3% | 18.9% | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 13.6% | 4.3% | 9.3% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 8.3% | 3.0% | 5.2% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from multilateral donors, Cape Verde or Congo?
- Cape Verde, at 3.6% against 2.1% in Congo as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from multilateral donors between Cape Verde and Congo?
- 1.5%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Congo?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Congo rank globally for net oda received from multilateral donors?
- Cape Verde ranks 35th and Congo ranks 38th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from multilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.