Equatorial Guinea vs Libya: Net ODA received from multilateral donors
Equatorial Guinea
0.0%
in 2011
Libya
0.1%
in 2008
Equatorial Guinea rank
49th
Libya rank
48th
Net ODA received from multilateral donors over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.1% against 0.0% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Libya's figure about 2.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Libya ranks 48th of 49 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30.7% | 0.1% | 30.6% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from multilateral donors, Equatorial Guinea or Libya?
- Libya, at 0.1% against 0.0% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net oda received from multilateral donors between Equatorial Guinea and Libya?
- 0.1%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Libya?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2008.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Libya rank globally for net oda received from multilateral donors?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Libya ranks 48th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from multilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.