Eswatini vs Guinea: Net ODA received from multilateral donors
Eswatini
15.5%
in 2011
Guinea
13.9%
in 2011
Eswatini rank
20th
Guinea rank
23rd
Net ODA received from multilateral donors over time
- Eswatini
- Guinea
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 15.5% against 13.9% in Guinea, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Guinea ahead.
Eswatini ranks 20th and Guinea ranks 23rd of 49 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 10.9% | 26.7% | 15.8% | Guinea |
| 1990s | 7.5% | 25.3% | 17.8% | Guinea |
| 2000s | 7.8% | 17.1% | 9.3% | Guinea |
| 2010s | 15.7% | 19.7% | 4.0% | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from multilateral donors, Eswatini or Guinea?
- Eswatini, at 15.5% against 13.9% in Guinea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from multilateral donors between Eswatini and Guinea?
- 1.6%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Guinea rank globally for net oda received from multilateral donors?
- Eswatini ranks 20th and Guinea ranks 23rd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from multilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.