Guinea vs Lesotho: Net ODA received from multilateral donors
Guinea
13.9%
in 2011
Lesotho
14.1%
in 2011
Guinea rank
23rd
Lesotho rank
21st
Net ODA received from multilateral donors over time
- Guinea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 14.1% against 13.9% in Guinea, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Lesotho ahead.
Guinea ranks 23rd and Lesotho ranks 21st of 49 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Lesotho in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 26.7% | 25.6% | 1.1% | Guinea |
| 1990s | 25.3% | 10.5% | 14.8% | Guinea |
| 2000s | 17.1% | 13.8% | 3.3% | Guinea |
| 2010s | 19.7% | 20.1% | 0.4% | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from multilateral donors, Guinea or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 14.1% against 13.9% in Guinea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from multilateral donors between Guinea and Lesotho?
- 0.2%, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Lesotho?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2011.
- How do Guinea and Lesotho rank globally for net oda received from multilateral donors?
- Guinea ranks 23rd and Lesotho ranks 21st of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from multilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.