Cape Verde vs Malawi: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors
Cape Verde
-0.0%
in 2011
Malawi
-0.0%
in 2011
Cape Verde rank
53rd
Malawi rank
51st
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time
- Cape Verde
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports -0.0% against -0.0% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 53rd and Malawi ranks 51st of 53 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.7% | Cape Verde |
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.2% | Malawi |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Malawi |
| 2010s | -0.0% | -0.0% | 0.0% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Cape Verde or Malawi?
- Malawi, at -0.0% against -0.0% in Cape Verde as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Cape Verde and Malawi?
- 0.0%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Malawi?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Malawi rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
- Cape Verde ranks 53rd and Malawi ranks 51st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.