Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Congo or Sao Tome and Principe?

Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Congo as of 2009.

What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?

0.0%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?

8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2009.

Where does this data come from?

Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors

Congo

0.0%

in 2011

Sao Tome and Principe

0.0%

in 2009

Congo rank

38th

Sao Tome and Principe rank

35th

Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time

Congo
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Congo, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 2.4 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Congo ranks 38th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 35th of 53 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Congo or Sao Tome and Principe?: Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Congo as of 2009.
What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?: 0.0%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?: 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2009.
How do Congo and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?: Congo ranks 38th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 35th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-bilateral-donors-percent-of-gdp/congo-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-bilateral-donors-percent-of-gdp/congo-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/">Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP)
Unit: % of GDP
Source: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 59 places, 1,867 data points, 1966–2011
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.