What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Côte d'Ivoire and Sao Tome and Principe?

0.0%, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Sao Tome and Principe?

8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2009.

Where does this data come from?

Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Côte d'Ivoire vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors

Côte d'Ivoire

0.0%

in 2011

Sao Tome and Principe

0.0%

in 2009

Côte d'Ivoire rank

33rd

Sao Tome and Principe rank

35th

Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time

Côte d'Ivoire
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 35th of 53 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Côte d'Ivoire or Sao Tome and Principe?: Côte d'Ivoire, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2011.
What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Côte d'Ivoire and Sao Tome and Principe?: 0.0%, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Sao Tome and Principe?: 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2009.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?: Côte d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 35th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-bilateral-donors-percent-of-gdp/cote-d-ivoire/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-bilateral-donors-percent-of-gdp/cote-d-ivoire/sao-tome-and-principe/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP)
Unit: % of GDP
Source: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 59 places, 1,867 data points, 1966–2011
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.