Djibouti vs Gambia: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors
Djibouti
1.0%
in 2009
Gambia
0.2%
in 2011
Djibouti rank
2nd
Gambia rank
5th
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time
- Djibouti
- Gambia
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 1.0% against 0.2% in Gambia, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 5.9 times Gambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 2nd and Gambia ranks 5th of 53 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2.8% | -0.2% | 3.0% | Djibouti |
| 1990s | 3.1% | -0.1% | 3.2% | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.1% | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Djibouti or Gambia?
- Djibouti, at 1.0% against 0.2% in Gambia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Djibouti and Gambia?
- 0.8%, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Gambia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2009.
- How do Djibouti and Gambia rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
- Djibouti ranks 2nd and Gambia ranks 5th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.