Eswatini vs Sudan: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors
Eswatini
0.1%
in 2011
Sudan
0.1%
in 2011
Eswatini rank
11th
Sudan rank
13th
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time
- Eswatini
- Sudan
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Sudan, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Sudan ahead.
Eswatini ranks 11th and Sudan ranks 13th of 53 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.2% | Sudan |
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.2% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Eswatini or Sudan?
- Eswatini, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Sudan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Eswatini and Sudan?
- 0.0%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Sudan rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
- Eswatini ranks 11th and Sudan ranks 13th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.