Mauritania vs Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors

Mauritania
0.3%
in 2011
Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa
0.0%
in 2011
Mauritania rank
4th
Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa rank
3rd

Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time

  • Mauritania
  • Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa
0102030196619882011

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.3% against 0.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa, a difference of 0.3%.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 14.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 4th and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa ranks 3rd of 53 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 4 and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 9.5% 1.1% 8.4% Mauritania
1980s 6.8% 0.3% 6.5% Mauritania
1990s -0.1% 0.1% 0.1% Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa
2000s 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% Mauritania
2010s 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Mauritania or Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
Mauritania, at 0.3% against 0.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa as of 2011.
What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Mauritania and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
0.3%, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
33 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2011.
How do Mauritania and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
Mauritania ranks 4th and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa ranks 3rd of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-bilateral-donors-percent-of-gdp/mauritania/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-bilateral-donors-percent-of-gdp/mauritania/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-south-africa/">Mauritania vs Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP)
Unit
% of GDP
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 1,867 data points, 1966–2011
Last refreshed

Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.