Mozambique vs Uganda: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors
Mozambique
0.0%
in 2011
Uganda
0.0%
in 2011
Mozambique rank
28th
Uganda rank
29th
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time
- Mozambique
- Uganda
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 28th and Uganda ranks 29th of 53 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Uganda |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.3% | Uganda |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Mozambique or Uganda?
- Mozambique, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Mozambique and Uganda?
- 0.0%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Uganda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2011.
- How do Mozambique and Uganda rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
- Mozambique ranks 28th and Uganda ranks 29th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.