Rwanda vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors

Rwanda
0.1%
in 2011
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.0%
in 2011
Rwanda rank
8th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
5th

Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
00.511.5197519932011

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.1% against 0.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.1%.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 9.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.

Rwanda ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 5th of 53 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0% 1.1% 1.1% Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
1980s 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
1990s 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% Rwanda
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2010s 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Rwanda or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Rwanda, at 0.1% against 0.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2011.
What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Rwanda and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
0.1%, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
33 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2011.
How do Rwanda and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
Rwanda ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 5th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-bilateral-donors-percent-of-gdp/rwanda/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-bilateral-donors-percent-of-gdp/rwanda/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Rwanda vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP)
Unit
% of GDP
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 1,867 data points, 1966–2011
Last refreshed

Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.