Seychelles vs Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors

Seychelles
0.5%
in 2011
Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa
0.0%
in 2011
Seychelles rank
3rd
Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa rank
3rd

Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time

  • Seychelles
  • Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa
02468197719942011

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 0.5% against 0.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa, a difference of 0.5%.

That makes Seychelles's figure about 23.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa ahead.

Seychelles ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa ranks 3rd of 53 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Seychelles averaged higher in 4 and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Seychelles Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 0.8% 1.1% 0.3% Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa
1980s 0.4% 0.3% 0.1% Seychelles
1990s 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% Seychelles
2000s 1.0% 0.0% 0.9% Seychelles
2010s 1.1% 0.0% 1.1% Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Seychelles or Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
Seychelles, at 0.5% against 0.0% in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa as of 2011.
What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Seychelles and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
0.5%, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Seychelles and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
31 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2011.
How do Seychelles and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
Seychelles ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa ranks 3rd of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Seychelles vs Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-bilateral-donors-percent-of-gdp/seychelles/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-bilateral-donors-percent-of-gdp/seychelles/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-south-africa/">Seychelles vs Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of GDP)
Unit
% of GDP
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 1,867 data points, 1966–2011
Last refreshed

Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.