Africa vs Eswatini: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors
Africa
0.1%
in 2011
Eswatini
1.0%
in 2011
Africa rank
4th
Eswatini rank
3rd
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time
- Africa
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1.0% against 0.1% in Africa, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 9.9 times Africa's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Eswatini ahead.
Africa ranks 4th and Eswatini ranks 3rd of 6 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Africa averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.6% | 1.0% | 0.4% | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 1.4% | 0.7% | 0.7% | Africa |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Africa |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.6% | 0.5% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Africa or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 1.0% against 0.1% in Africa as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Africa and Eswatini?
- 0.9%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Eswatini?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2011.
- How do Africa and Eswatini rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
- Africa ranks 4th and Eswatini ranks 3rd of 6 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.