Botswana vs Tunisia: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors
Botswana
0.1%
in 2011
Tunisia
0.2%
in 2011
Botswana rank
16th
Tunisia rank
15th
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time
- Botswana
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0.2% against 0.1% in Botswana, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 16th and Tunisia ranks 15th of 49 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.2% | Botswana |
| 1990s | -0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Tunisia |
| 2000s | -0.0% | -0.1% | 0.1% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Botswana or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0.2% against 0.1% in Botswana as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Botswana and Tunisia?
- 0.1%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Tunisia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2011.
- How do Botswana and Tunisia rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
- Botswana ranks 16th and Tunisia ranks 15th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.