Cape Verde vs Djibouti: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors
Cape Verde
-0.1%
in 2011
Djibouti
-0.1%
in 2007
Cape Verde rank
49th
Djibouti rank
48th
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time
- Cape Verde
- Djibouti
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports -0.1% against -0.1% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Djibouti ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 49th and Djibouti ranks 48th of 49 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2% | 24.8% | 24.6% | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 3.2% | 3.2% | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Cape Verde or Djibouti?
- Djibouti, at -0.1% against -0.1% in Cape Verde as of 2007.
- What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Cape Verde and Djibouti?
- 0.0%, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Djibouti?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2007.
- How do Cape Verde and Djibouti rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
- Cape Verde ranks 49th and Djibouti ranks 48th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.