Comoros vs Eritrea: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors
Comoros
1.4%
in 2009
Eritrea
1.7%
in 2007
Comoros rank
2nd
Eritrea rank
1st
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time
- Comoros
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1.7% against 1.4% in Comoros, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eritrea ahead.
Comoros ranks 2nd and Eritrea ranks 1st of 49 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.0% | 5.8% | 2.8% | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1.8% | 1.3% | 0.5% | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Comoros or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 1.7% against 1.4% in Comoros as of 2007.
- What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Comoros and Eritrea?
- 0.3%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Eritrea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2007.
- How do Comoros and Eritrea rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
- Comoros ranks 2nd and Eritrea ranks 1st of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.