Comoros vs Eswatini: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors
Comoros
1.4%
in 2009
Eswatini
1.0%
in 2011
Comoros rank
2nd
Eswatini rank
3rd
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time
- Comoros
- Eswatini
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 1.4% against 1.0% in Eswatini, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Eswatini ahead.
Comoros ranks 2nd and Eswatini ranks 3rd of 49 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.6% | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 2.7% | 0.9% | 1.8% | Comoros |
| 2000s | 2.3% | 0.2% | 2.1% | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Comoros or Eswatini?
- Comoros, at 1.4% against 1.0% in Eswatini as of 2009.
- What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Comoros and Eswatini?
- 0.4%, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Eswatini?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2009.
- How do Comoros and Eswatini rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
- Comoros ranks 2nd and Eswatini ranks 3rd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.