Egypt vs Ethiopia: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors
Egypt
0.2%
in 2011
Ethiopia
0.2%
in 2011
Egypt rank
11th
Ethiopia rank
12th
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time
- Egypt
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Egypt ranks 11th and Ethiopia ranks 12th of 49 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.1% | 1.2% | 1.0% | Ethiopia |
| 1990s | 5.2% | 0.7% | 4.5% | Egypt |
| 2000s | 0.6% | 1.1% | 0.5% | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.2% | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Egypt or Ethiopia?
- Egypt, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Ethiopia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Egypt and Ethiopia?
- 0.0%, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2011.
- How do Egypt and Ethiopia rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
- Egypt ranks 11th and Ethiopia ranks 12th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.