Libya vs South Africa: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors
Libya
0.0%
in 2008
South Africa
0.0%
in 2011
Libya rank
37th
South Africa rank
40th
Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time
- Libya
- South Africa
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Libya's figure about 5.7 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 37th and South Africa ranks 40th of 49 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | South Africa |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Libya or South Africa?
- Libya, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Libya and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and South Africa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2008.
- How do Libya and South Africa rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?
- Libya ranks 37th and South Africa ranks 40th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.