How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zimbabwe?

9 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2008.

Where does this data come from?

Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Libya vs Zimbabwe: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors

Libya

0.0%

in 2008

Zimbabwe

0.0%

in 2011

Libya rank

37th

Zimbabwe rank

34th

Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors over time

Libya
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Libya, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 49 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Libya	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0%	-0.1%	0.1%	Libya
2000s	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors, Libya or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Libya as of 2011.
What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors between Libya and Zimbabwe?: 0.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zimbabwe?: 9 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2008.
How do Libya and Zimbabwe rank globally for net oda received from non-dac bilateral donors?: Libya ranks 37th and Zimbabwe ranks 34th of 49 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Zimbabwe: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-bilateral-donors-percent-of-gross-capital-formation/libya/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-bilateral-donors-percent-of-gross-capital-formation/libya/zimbabwe/">Libya vs Zimbabwe: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Net ODA received from non-DAC bilateral donors (% of gross capital formation)
Unit: % of gross capital formation
Source: Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 55 places, 1,707 data points, 1966–2011
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.