Libya vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net ODA received from non-DAC donors

Libya
120.10 million constant 2010 US$
in 2011
Sub-Saharan Africa
291.05 million constant 2010 US$
in 2011
Libya rank
1st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
3rd

Net ODA received from non-DAC donors over time

  • Libya
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196619882011

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 291.05 million constant 2010 US$ against 120.10 million constant 2010 US$ in Libya, a difference of 170.95 million constant 2010 US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 2.4 times Libya's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 3rd of 53 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 140,000 constant 2010 US$ 1.82 billion constant 2010 US$ 1.82 billion constant 2010 US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 134.62 million constant 2010 US$ 1.73 billion constant 2010 US$ 1.60 billion constant 2010 US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 80,000 constant 2010 US$ 95.40 million constant 2010 US$ 95.32 million constant 2010 US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 2.04 million constant 2010 US$ 264.56 million constant 2010 US$ 262.53 million constant 2010 US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 60.56 million constant 2010 US$ 270.07 million constant 2010 US$ 209.51 million constant 2010 US$ Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net oda received from non-dac donors, Libya or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 291.05 million constant 2010 US$ against 120.10 million constant 2010 US$ in Libya as of 2011.
What is the difference in net oda received from non-dac donors between Libya and Sub-Saharan Africa?
170.95 million constant 2010 US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sub-Saharan Africa?
15 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2011.
How do Libya and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net oda received from non-dac donors?
Libya ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 3rd of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received from non-DAC donors (constant 2010 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net ODA received from non-DAC donors. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-donors-constant-2010-us/libya/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/net-oda-received-from-non-dac-donors-constant-2010-us/libya/sub-saharan-africa/">Libya vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net ODA received from non-DAC donors</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net ODA received from non-DAC donors (constant 2010 US$)
Unit
constant 2010 US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 1,984 data points, 1966–2011
Last refreshed

Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period. Data are in constant 2008 dollars.