Cape Verde vs Guinea-Bissau: Net ODA received
Cape Verde
12.9%
in 2011
Guinea-Bissau
12.3%
in 2011
Cape Verde rank
13th
Guinea-Bissau rank
15th
Net ODA received over time
- Cape Verde
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 12.9% against 12.3% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 13th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 15th of 53 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 40.1% | 48.1% | 8.1% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1990s | 26.9% | 48.6% | 21.7% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 14.7% | 22.2% | 7.4% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 16.3% | 14.5% | 1.9% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received, Cape Verde or Guinea-Bissau?
- Cape Verde, at 12.9% against 12.3% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received between Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.6%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for net oda received?
- Cape Verde ranks 13th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 15th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.