Mauritania vs Uganda: Net ODA received
Mauritania
8.8%
in 2011
Uganda
9.4%
in 2011
Mauritania rank
24th
Uganda rank
22nd
Net ODA received over time
- Mauritania
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 9.4% against 8.8% in Mauritania, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Uganda ahead.
Mauritania ranks 24th and Uganda ranks 22nd of 53 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.2% | 3.5% | 1.7% | Mauritania |
| 1970s | 20.8% | 1.7% | 19.1% | Mauritania |
| 1980s | 25.1% | 6.6% | 18.5% | Mauritania |
| 1990s | 17.9% | 15.7% | 2.2% | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 14.5% | 13.7% | 0.9% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 9.5% | 9.7% | 0.2% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received, Mauritania or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 9.4% against 8.8% in Mauritania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received between Mauritania and Uganda?
- 0.6%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Uganda?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2011.
- How do Mauritania and Uganda rank globally for net oda received?
- Mauritania ranks 24th and Uganda ranks 22nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.