Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Net ODA received
Mauritania
8.8%
in 2011
Zimbabwe
7.4%
in 2011
Mauritania rank
24th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Net ODA received over time
- Mauritania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 8.8% against 7.4% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 53 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.3% | 0.2% | 6.0% | Mauritania |
| 1970s | 20.8% | 0.1% | 20.7% | Mauritania |
| 1980s | 25.1% | 3.3% | 21.8% | Mauritania |
| 1990s | 17.9% | 5.8% | 12.1% | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 14.5% | 6.1% | 8.4% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 9.5% | 8.6% | 0.8% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received, Mauritania or Zimbabwe?
- Mauritania, at 8.8% against 7.4% in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received between Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
- 1.4%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2011.
- How do Mauritania and Zimbabwe rank globally for net oda received?
- Mauritania ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.