Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net ODA received
Rwanda
19.8%
in 2011
Sao Tome and Principe
30.2%
in 2011
Rwanda rank
6th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
4th
Net ODA received over time
- Rwanda
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 30.2% against 19.8% in Rwanda, a difference of 10.4%.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.5 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Rwanda ranks 6th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 4th of 53 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.9% | 31.8% | 12.0% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 19.1% | 27.4% | 8.3% | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received, Rwanda or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 30.2% against 19.8% in Rwanda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in net oda received between Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 10.4%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net oda received?
- Rwanda ranks 6th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 4th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Net ODA received (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Official development assistance and net official aid record the actual international transfer by the donor of financial resources or of goods or services valued at the cost to the donor, less any repayments of loan principal during the same period.